The Editors then make a decision based on the Reviewers' advice, from among several possibilities: (a) Accept, with or without editorial revisions (b) Invite the authors to revise their manuscript to address specific concerns before a final decision is reached (c) Reject, but indicate to the authors that further work might justify a resubmission (d) Reject outright, typically on grounds of specialist interest, lack of novelty, insufficient conceptual advance or major technical and/or interpretational problems. Stamped Concrete Cyprus Uncategorized waiting to send decision to author npj. Editors need to identify, invite and get (often two or more) reviewers to agree to review. The Editors may take time to discuss the reviews and may invite more reviewers or assign another editor, returning the submission to an earlier status. AbstractThe identification of molecular targets of bioactive food components is important to understand the mechanistic aspect of their physiological functions. This section explains the editorial processes at the npj Series, which can be outlined in the following steps: Please see our Manuscript Transfer FAQ for more information about this service. We prefer vector files with editable layers. DOI: 10.1016/j.chempr.2016.04.001generalspecialized, Science Nature Science Nature general science, JACS Angewandte Chemiegeneral chemistryspecializedAnalytical Chemistry, UCSDGuy BertrandGuyACS Award in Inorganic Chemistry (2014)GuyInorganic Chemistry Dalton Transactions Chemistry-An Asian JournalGuyDalton TransactionsChemistry-An Asian Journal general interestsChemical Communications Organic Letters Chemical Communications Organic Letters OL, Chem X-MOLGuy9Science Science, Science wordGuycover letterJACS Angewandte Chemie cover letterunder evaluationto advisoradvisorgeneralAAASemail2advisorchemistrygeneral science, Science GuyNatureNature ChemistryNature wordNature Guy, Nature manuscript receivededitor assignedmanuscript under considerationFigure 1GuyNature emailNature general scienceNature Nature Chemistry Nature Chemistrypeer reviewGuyDavidNature Chemistry is not bad., 50decision sent to authorwaiting for revisionFigure 2DavidUCSDfacetime50f**king awesomeGuyemailDavidimessageGuy, 1Guy, 3, Guy1Guy80201email1, GuyDavidNature Chemistry DavidBlack FridayGuyInorganic Chemistry1waiting for revision, Cell PressChem158Cell PressDr. [CDATA[> Data sets should be summarized with descriptive statistics, which should include the n value for each data set, a clearly labeled measure of centre (such as the mean or the median), and a clearly labeled measure of variability (such as standard deviation or range). Thus, we ask authors to recolor green-and-red heatmaps, graphs and schematics for which colours are chosen arbitrarily. Author KL has previously acted as a paid consultant for [company name B] but declares no non-financial competing interests. 'Submission Transfers Waiting for Author's Approval'. The npj Series journals use standard Nature referencing style. 0, 89